Mary + Kevin’s Modern Yellow and Black Letterpress Wedding Invitations

Colleen from Cleanwash Letterpress sent over these beautiful letterpress wedding invitations that she designed for a recent bride – who also happens to be Colleen’s cousin!

yellow black white letterpress wedding invitations 500x747 Mary + Kevins Modern Yellow and Black Letterpress Wedding Invitations

Colleen came up with a modern design in a bold yellow, black, and white color palette – all printed on 100% cotton paper:

yellow black white letterpress wedding invitations suite 500x530 Mary + Kevins Modern Yellow and Black Letterpress Wedding Invitations

The rsvp card was printed on super-thick coaster stock for a bit of additional weight:

yellow black white letterpress wedding invitations rsvp 500x334 Mary + Kevins Modern Yellow and Black Letterpress Wedding Invitations

Since the wedding ceremony and reception took place in two different locations, Colleen printed a matching reception card with all the reception venue information for the bride to enclose in the invitation suite:

yellow black white letterpress wedding invitations reception card 500x334 Mary + Kevins Modern Yellow and Black Letterpress Wedding Invitations

yellow black white letterpress wedding invitation2 500x334 Mary + Kevins Modern Yellow and Black Letterpress Wedding Invitations

Thanks so much Colleen!  Colleen is still working on her website, but in the meantime you can check out more of Colleen’s work over on her blog.

{image credits: cleanwash letterpress}

pixel Mary + Kevins Modern Yellow and Black Letterpress Wedding Invitations
Comments
5 Responses to “Mary + Kevin’s Modern Yellow and Black Letterpress Wedding Invitations”
  1. I love the yellow and black combo!

  2. Colleen is such a talent — letterpress truly is an artform and she certainly does it justice. It’s always a pleasure to work on projects with her!

  3. Awesome, thanks for sharing Nole!

  4. Lauren says:

    Wow, I love it! So refreshing. Strikes a perfect balance btwn fun + formal.

Leave a Reply: