Stationery vs. Stationary Tote Bags

These awe­some tote bags were the unof­fi­cial biggest hit at the National Sta­tionery Show last month – sta­tion­ers and blog­gers alike made a bee­line for the Sapling Press booth to pick up one of Lisa’s sta­tionery totes!  I’ve been car­ry­ing mine around with me ever since the show, and Lisa has finally made them avail­able in the Sapling Press shop!  Get yours right here.

{image cred­its: Sapling Press}

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
Comments
13 Responses to “Stationery vs. Stationary Tote Bags”
  1. These are so adorable. I will be pur­chas­ing one of these totes to carry around and help oth­ers spell sta­tionery with an e, and not an a. Great idea!

  2. Scott PF says:

    E for Enve­lope. That’s an easy way to remem­ber. And yes, I learned this the hard way — hav­ing it pointed out to me in an interview.

  3. love it!!!! what a great idea!!! have a nice sunday!

  4. i LOVE these! how funny. that is such a com­mon mis­take [that typ­i­cally dri­ves me crazy]…i’d be happy to have a bag like that to remind peo­ple which is which :)

  5. richele says:

    ha! I’ve made that mis­take before!!

  6. I have one too and use it all the time! They are awe­some! really high qual­ity and sturdy too.

  7. Won­der­ful bag! So many peo­ple make this mis­take and this is a great way to politely spread the word.

  8. teresa says:

    Thanks for shar­ing. I just bought one. Bril­liant! Peo­ple are so clever!

  9. Jane says:

    I need one so badly! It’s one of my pet peeves.

  10. Daniella says:

    Haha­haha this is awesome!

  11. kelly says:

    great­est bag, ever! the con­fu­sion of the two spellings is always a big pet peeve of mine! such a ridicu­lously smart cre­ation! thanks for sharing!

  12. So smart! Need one. Even though we are design­ers, it took us a while to spell it right too!

  13. Adele {modernemotive} says:

    Oh my, as a sta­tionery designer, I love them! Fab­u­lous idea Sapling Press!

Leave a Reply: